This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
This article is within the scope of National Archives project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The lead states "a sum of $7.2 million in 1867 (equivalent to $22.5 billion in 2023)", while the description under the first photo states "US$7.2 million check used to pay for Alaska (equivalent to $129 million in 2023)". So, which is correct? 92.109.99.223 (talk) 20:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have unified the article to $129M using our {{inflation}} template. Note the ref after the equivalent specifies that GDP deflator is being used. $22.5 billion appears to come from nominal GDP. I suppose both could be argued for, but I have gone with the referenced value and the standard Wikipedia template. Thanks for spotting the discrepancy. Commander Keane (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was a rather big contribution actually. Before I made the fix a Google search for how much is the alaska purchase worth today shouted $22.5 Billion at me, now the first result is is $129M. I think Google turned off their AI search (the shouter) since then. Commander Keane (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have an entire WP article based on a document - the Alaska purchase agreement - but no copy of the document. Surely it exists on the internet somewhere? 14.2.207.148 (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "We don't keep the documents on here" - every major treaty signed over the past 200 years that meet WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY has a copy on Wikipedia. Plus if there was a copy under External Links, that would be hosting a copy, would it not? And no, there is not a copy under external links - I do not refer to a copy of a check for payment, nor a vote in congress that a treaty should be signed, but an actual copy of the purchase agreement/treaty itself. As this treaty was co-signed by the US, there must be a copy of one in English somewhere.
This article has been around since 2003, is of interest to several WikiProjects, yet still has a quality rating of only C: "The article is substantial but is still missing important content." It certainly is. 14.2.207.148 (talk) 01:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]